Grupy różniły się wiekiem na poziom

Grupy różniły się wiekiem na poziomie trendu (test Kruskala-Wallisa χ² = 5,78, df = 2, p = 0,06): użytkujący ochraniaczy typu „boil and bite” byli młodsi od pozostałych (Tabela 4) oraz doświadczeniem w trenowaniu (test Kruskala-Wallisa χ² = 9,23, df = 2, p < 0,01): posiadający ochraniacze standardowe i „boil and bite” trenowali krócej niż indywidualne.

Wyniki (angielski) 1:

A group of different age level trend (Kruskal-Wallis χ ² = 5.78, df = 2, p = 0.06): intensive type protectors "boil and bite" they were younger than the other (table 4) and experience in training (Kruskal-Wallis χ ² = 9.23, df = 2, p < 0.01): with protection standard and "boil and bite" have trained less than the individual.

Wyniki (angielski) 2:

Groups differed in age at the level of trend (Kruskal-Wallis χ² = 5.78, df = 2, p = 0.06) operations using protectors of "boil and bite" were younger than the others (Table 4) and experience in coaching ( Kruskal-Wallis test χ² = 9.23, df = 2, p <0.01) having the protectors standard and "boil and bite" trained less than the individual.

Wyniki (angielski) 3:

groups differed in age level trend test (kruskala - wallis χ² = 5,78, df = 2, p = 0.06): using padding type „boil and bite "were younger than the others (table 4) and experience in training (test kruskala - wallis χ² = 9,23, df = 2, p < 0.01): having pads the standard and „boil and bite" were less than the individual.